User:A29mukhe: Difference between revisions

From statwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


1) Random train-val-test split might have effects of the performance of the model, but it can be improved by access with a larger data set and further discussion  
1) Random train-val-test split might have effects of the performance of the model, but it can be improved by access with a larger data set and further discussion  
2)  random initialization of the weights of neural network shows little effects on the performance of the model performance evaluation, because of showing a high average results with a fixed train-val-test split  
2)  random initialization of the weights of neural network shows little effects on the performance of the model performance evaluation, because of showing a high average results with a fixed train-val-test split  


Line 16: Line 17:


6. Further using 290 fold patient-wise split, resulting the same highest accuracy of the pair v6 and vz as record-wise split  
6. Further using 290 fold patient-wise split, resulting the same highest accuracy of the pair v6 and vz as record-wise split  
1) Discuss patient-wise split might result lower accuracy evaluation, however, it still maintain an average of 97.83%
1) Discuss patient-wise split might result lower accuracy evaluation, however, it still maintain an average of 97.83%

Revision as of 20:11, 25 October 2020


Result: 1. Quantification of accuracies for single channels with 20-fold cross-validation, resulting highest individual accuracies: v5, v6, vx, vz, and ii

2. Quantification of accuracies for pairs of top 5 highest individual channels with 20-fold cross-validation, resulting highest pairs accuracies to fed into a the neural network: lead v6 and lead vz

3. Use 100-fold cross validation on v6 and vz pair of channels, then compare outliers based on top 20, top 50 and total 100 performing models, finding that standard deviation is non-trivial and there are few models performed very poorly.

4. Discussing 2 factors effecting model performance evaluation:

1) Random train-val-test split might have effects of the performance of the model, but it can be improved by access with a larger data set and further discussion

2) random initialization of the weights of neural network shows little effects on the performance of the model performance evaluation, because of showing a high average results with a fixed train-val-test split

5. Comparing with other models, the model in this article has the highest accuracy, specificity, and precision

6. Further using 290 fold patient-wise split, resulting the same highest accuracy of the pair v6 and vz as record-wise split

1) Discuss patient-wise split might result lower accuracy evaluation, however, it still maintain an average of 97.83%