metric and Kernel Learning Using a Linear Transformation
Introduction
The motivation of the papers is to combine the advantages of Mahalanobis distance learning and kernel learning. Mahalanobis distance learning can deal with out-of-sample points and avoid overfitting, while it is merely linear transformation and the number of parameters grows quadratically with the dimensionality. Kernel learning using non-linear kernels enable implicit non-linear transformation, while it is not easy to be applied to out-of-sample points. The paper shows metric learning with linear transformations is equivalent to learning a linear transformation kernel. They use LogDet divergence to formulate a metric learning problem. The LogDet divergence can make the optimization simpler and have a precedence in optimization and statistics. They claim that their algorithm is scalable to large data sets and allow learning of a linear transformation in the kernel space so that it can handle out-of-sample extensions. Also, even though the matrix to be learned may be infinite-dimensional, it can be fully represtend in terms of the constrained data points.
LogDet Divergence Based Metric Learning
The original Mahalanobis distance metric is as follows:
[math]\displaystyle{ d_W(x_i,x_j)=(x_i-x_j)^TW(x_i-x_j) }[/math]
In order to deal with the nonlinear case, we use a nonlinear mapping of the data points:
[math]\displaystyle{ d_W(\phi(x_i),\phi(x_j))=(\phi(x_i)-\phi(x_j))^TW(\phi(x_i)-\phi(x_j)) }[/math]
The main challenge is the computation of W. The paper uses the LogDet divergence. The LogDet divergence between two PSD matrices W and [math]\displaystyle{ W_0\in\Re^{d \times d} }[/math] is defined as:
[math]\displaystyle{ D_ld(W,W_0)=tr(WW_0^{-1})-logdet(WW_0^{-1})-d }[/math]
Given the similarity constrains S and dissimilarity constrains D, the following problem is proposed in [1]:
We can also get the kernelized form of the above formulation [2]:
The paper proves that there are connections between the optimal solutions of the above two problems. Suppose the optimal learned kernel is K* and the optimal learned Mahalanobis matrix is W*, they are related as follows:
The identical matrix I can be generalized to any arbitrary matrix W0 and the theory holds. To compute the out-of-sample extension, we can represent the inner product of the points after linear transformation by the inner product of the points before transformation:
We would like to solve a kernel learning problem instead of a metric learning problem in kernel space. Also the slack variables are introduced to deal with the infeasible case:
Bregman projections technique is used to solve the above problem as discussed in [2]. An iterative method with rank-one update in each iteration is proposed:
[math]\displaystyle{ K \leftarrow K + \beta K(e_i-e_j)(e_i-e_j)^TK }[/math]
The algorithm is as follows:
File:alg metric kernel learning.png
The paper also proposes a heuristic to deal with large data sets. instead of learning Mahalanobis distance or kernel as a full [math]\displaystyle{ d \times d }[/math] (or [math]\displaystyle{ n \times n }[/math]) matrix with [math]\displaystyle{ O(min(n,d)^2) }[/math] parameters, they use compressed representations and parameterize matrices by only [math]\displaystyle{ O(min(n,d)) }[/math] values.
Kernel Learning with Other Convex Loss Functions
The authors show that their kernel matrix learning problem is equivalent to learning a linear transformation kernel function with a specific loss function. Considering the size of kernel matrices and parameter matrices will grow quadratically with the number of data points, they reduce the parameters to learn by introducing an additional constraint, similar to the special case of the LogDet divergence.
Experiments
The proposed method is compared as other metric learning algorithms such as MCML and LMNN on benchmark data, high-dimensional vision, and text classification problems as well as a semi-supervised kernel dimensionality reduction problems (Figure 1-3).
The results show their method outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.
Reference
[1] Davis, Jason V., et al. "Information-theoretic metric learning." Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning. ACM, 2007.
[2] Kulis, Brian, M¨¢ty¨¢s A. Sustik, and Inderjit S. Dhillon. "Low-rank kernel learning with Bregman matrix divergences." The Journal of Machine Learning Research 10 (2009): 341-376.