User:A29mukhe: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "e") |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Result: | |||
1. Quantification of accuracies for single channels with 20-fold cross-validation, resulting highest individual accuracies: v5, v6, vx, vz, and ii | |||
2. Quantification of accuracies for pairs of top 5 highest individual channels with 20-fold cross-validation, resulting highest pairs accuracies to fed into a the neural network: lead v6 and lead vz | |||
3. Use 100-fold cross validation on v6 and vz pair of channels, then compare outliers based on top 20, top 50 and total 100 performing models, finding that standard deviation is non-trivial and there are few models performed very poorly. | |||
4. Discussing 2 factors effecting model performance evaluation: | |||
1) Random train-val-test split might have effects of the performance of the model, but it can be improved by access with a larger data set and further discussion | |||
2) random initialization of the weights of neural network shows little effects on the performance of the model performance evaluation, because of showing a high average results with a fixed train-val-test split | |||
5. Comparing with other models, the model in this article has the highest accuracy, specificity, and precision | |||
6. Further using 290 fold patient-wise split, resulting the same highest accuracy of the pair v6 and vz as record-wise split | |||
1) Discuss patient-wise split might result lower accuracy evaluation, however, it still maintain an average of 97.83% |
Revision as of 19:10, 25 October 2020
Result:
1. Quantification of accuracies for single channels with 20-fold cross-validation, resulting highest individual accuracies: v5, v6, vx, vz, and ii
2. Quantification of accuracies for pairs of top 5 highest individual channels with 20-fold cross-validation, resulting highest pairs accuracies to fed into a the neural network: lead v6 and lead vz
3. Use 100-fold cross validation on v6 and vz pair of channels, then compare outliers based on top 20, top 50 and total 100 performing models, finding that standard deviation is non-trivial and there are few models performed very poorly.
4. Discussing 2 factors effecting model performance evaluation:
1) Random train-val-test split might have effects of the performance of the model, but it can be improved by access with a larger data set and further discussion 2) random initialization of the weights of neural network shows little effects on the performance of the model performance evaluation, because of showing a high average results with a fixed train-val-test split
5. Comparing with other models, the model in this article has the highest accuracy, specificity, and precision
6. Further using 290 fold patient-wise split, resulting the same highest accuracy of the pair v6 and vz as record-wise split 1) Discuss patient-wise split might result lower accuracy evaluation, however, it still maintain an average of 97.83%