independent Component Analysis: algorithms and applications: Difference between revisions
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
'''ICA''' shows, perhaps surprisingly, that the ''cocktail-party problem'' can be solved by imposing two rather weak (and realistic) assumptions, namely that the source signals are statistically independent and have non-Gaussian distributions. Note that PCA and classical factor analysis cannot solve the ''cocktail-party problem'' because such methods seek components that are merely uncorrelated, a condition much weaker than independence. | |||
===Definition of ICA=== | ===Definition of ICA=== |
Revision as of 12:55, 5 July 2009
Motivation
Imagine a room where two people are speaking at the same time and two microphones are used to record the speech signals. Denoting the speech signals by [math]\displaystyle{ s_1(t) \, }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ s_2(t)\, }[/math] and the recorded signals by [math]\displaystyle{ x_1(t) \, }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ x_2(t) \, }[/math], we can assume the linear relation [math]\displaystyle{ x = As \, }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ A \, }[/math] is a parameter matrix that depends on the distances of the microphones from the speakers. The interesting problem of estimating both [math]\displaystyle{ A\, }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ s\, }[/math] using only the recorded signals [math]\displaystyle{ x\, }[/math] is called the cocktail-party problem, which is the signature problem for ICA.
Introduction
ICA shows, perhaps surprisingly, that the cocktail-party problem can be solved by imposing two rather weak (and realistic) assumptions, namely that the source signals are statistically independent and have non-Gaussian distributions. Note that PCA and classical factor analysis cannot solve the cocktail-party problem because such methods seek components that are merely uncorrelated, a condition much weaker than independence.