large-Scale Supervised Sparse Principal Component Analysis: Difference between revisions

From statwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== 1. Introduction == The drawbacks of most existing technique: '''1 Drawbacks of Existing techniques''' Existing techniques include ad-hoc methods(e.g. factor rotation techn...")
 
Line 11: Line 11:
'''2 Contribution of this paper'''
'''2 Contribution of this paper'''


This paper solves DSPCA in a computationally easier way, and hence it is a good solution for large scale data sets. This paper applies a block coordinate ascent algorithm with computational complexity
This paper solves DSPCA in a computationally easier way, and hence it is a good solution for large scale data sets. This paper applies a block coordinate ascent algorithm with computational complexity <math>O(\hat{n^3})</math>, where <math>\hat{n}</math> is the intrinsic dimension of the data. Since <math>\hat{n}</math> could be very small compared to the dimension <math>n</math> of the data, this algorithm is computationally easy.
 
== 2. Primal problem ==
 
The sparse PCA problem can be formulated as <math>max_x \  x^T \Sigma x - \lambda \| x \|_0 : \| x \|_2=1</math>.
 
This is equivalent to <math>max_z</math> '''Tr'''<math>\Sigma Z - \lambda \sqrt{\| Z \|_0} : Z \succeq 0</math>, Tr <math>Z=1</math>, Rank<math>(Z)=1</math>.
 
Replacing the <math>\sqrt{\| Z \|_0}</math> with <math>\| Z \|_1</math> and dropping the rank constraint gives a relaxation of the original non-convex problem:
 
<math>max_z</math> '''Tr'''<math>\Sigma Z - \lambda \| Z \|_1 : Z \succeq 0</math>, Tr <math>Z=1</math>.
 
Fortunately, this relaxation approximates the original non-convex problem to a convex problem.

Revision as of 21:53, 4 August 2013

1. Introduction

The drawbacks of most existing technique:

1 Drawbacks of Existing techniques

Existing techniques include ad-hoc methods(e.g. factor rotation techniques, simple thresholding), greedy algorithms, SCoTLASS, the regularized SVD method, SPCA, the generalized power method. These methods are based on non-convex optimization and they don't guarantee global optimum.

A semi-definite relaxation method called DSPCA can guarantee global convergence and has better performance than above algorithms, however, it is computationally expensive.

2 Contribution of this paper

This paper solves DSPCA in a computationally easier way, and hence it is a good solution for large scale data sets. This paper applies a block coordinate ascent algorithm with computational complexity [math]\displaystyle{ O(\hat{n^3}) }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{n} }[/math] is the intrinsic dimension of the data. Since [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{n} }[/math] could be very small compared to the dimension [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] of the data, this algorithm is computationally easy.

2. Primal problem

The sparse PCA problem can be formulated as [math]\displaystyle{ max_x \ x^T \Sigma x - \lambda \| x \|_0 : \| x \|_2=1 }[/math].

This is equivalent to [math]\displaystyle{ max_z }[/math] Tr[math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma Z - \lambda \sqrt{\| Z \|_0} : Z \succeq 0 }[/math], Tr [math]\displaystyle{ Z=1 }[/math], Rank[math]\displaystyle{ (Z)=1 }[/math].

Replacing the [math]\displaystyle{ \sqrt{\| Z \|_0} }[/math] with [math]\displaystyle{ \| Z \|_1 }[/math] and dropping the rank constraint gives a relaxation of the original non-convex problem:

[math]\displaystyle{ max_z }[/math] Tr[math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma Z - \lambda \| Z \|_1 : Z \succeq 0 }[/math], Tr [math]\displaystyle{ Z=1 }[/math].

Fortunately, this relaxation approximates the original non-convex problem to a convex problem.