deep Sparse Rectifier Neural Networks: Difference between revisions
(→Method) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Results == | == Results == | ||
In the NORB and sentiment analysis cases, the network benefited greatly from pre-training. However, the benefit in NORB diminished as the training set size grew. | |||
== Criticism == | == Criticism == | ||
Rectified linear neurons really aren't biologically plausible for a variety of reasons. However, they can be transformed into spiking neural networks. | Rectified linear neurons really aren't biologically plausible for a variety of reasons. However, they can be transformed into spiking neural networks. |
Revision as of 21:31, 9 November 2015
Introduction
Two trends in Deep Learning can be seen in terms of architecture improvements. The first is increasing sparsity (for example, see convolutional neural nets) and increasing biological plausibility (biologically plausible sigmoid neurons performing better than tanh neurons). Rectified linear neurons are good for sparsity and for biological plausibility, thus should increase performance.
Biological Plausibility
Sparsity
Experiments
Networks with rectifier neurons were applied to the domains of image recognition (both black and white, colour and stereo images) and sentiment analysis.
Results
In the NORB and sentiment analysis cases, the network benefited greatly from pre-training. However, the benefit in NORB diminished as the training set size grew.
Criticism
Rectified linear neurons really aren't biologically plausible for a variety of reasons. However, they can be transformed into spiking neural networks.