kernelized Locality-Sensitive Hashing: Difference between revisions

From statwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


=== Central Limit Theorem ===
=== Central Limit Theorem ===
Suppose <math>\mathcal{D}</math> is a multivariate distribution with mean <math>\mu</math> and covariance <math>\Sigma</math>. Let <math>x_1, x_2, ..., x_t</math> be <math>t</math> random vectors sampled <i>i.i.d</i> from <math>\mathcal{D}</math>. The central limit theorem tells us that for sufficiently large <math>t</math>, the random vector
<math>z_t = \sqrt{t}(\bar{x}_t - \mu)</math>
approximately follows a multivariate Gaussian distribution <math>\mathcal{N}(0,\Sigma)</math>, where <math>\bar{x}_t = \frac{1}{t} \sum_i x_i</math>
=== Whitening Transform ===
=== Whitening Transform ===
=== Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma ===
=== Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma ===

Revision as of 11:23, 8 July 2013

Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) is a form of dimension reduction that finds embedding of high dimensional data into a low dimensional hamming space while providing probabilistic collision guarantees. That is, similar data points will have the same low dimensional mapping with high probability. One immediate application of LSH is large scale nearest neighbour search/classification. A large database of objects (e.g. images) can be partitioned into disjoint buckets so that objects of a single bucket share the same low dimensional representation which is used as a key to that bucket. At query time, the low dimensional representation of the query object determines a single bucket of “the most probably similar objects” which can then be searched in the traditional way.

For each similarity measure, a locality sensitive hashing method has to be designed carefully to ensure practically acceptable probabilistic collision guarantees. It was also noticed that most of the previous work done on LSH assumes that data points come from multidimensional vector space and the underlying embedding is explicitly known. However, that is not always the case. For example the RBF kernel maps the data to an infinite dimensional space which is intractable to explicitly work with. This paper generalizes locality sensitive hashing by proposing a fully kernelized method that provides the desirable collision guarantees.

Preliminaries

Central Limit Theorem

Suppose [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{D} }[/math] is a multivariate distribution with mean [math]\displaystyle{ \mu }[/math] and covariance [math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma }[/math]. Let [math]\displaystyle{ x_1, x_2, ..., x_t }[/math] be [math]\displaystyle{ t }[/math] random vectors sampled i.i.d from [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{D} }[/math]. The central limit theorem tells us that for sufficiently large [math]\displaystyle{ t }[/math], the random vector

[math]\displaystyle{ z_t = \sqrt{t}(\bar{x}_t - \mu) }[/math]

approximately follows a multivariate Gaussian distribution [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{N}(0,\Sigma) }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ \bar{x}_t = \frac{1}{t} \sum_i x_i }[/math]

Whitening Transform

Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma

Random Projection

Kernel Centering

Locality Sensitive Hashing

Kernelized Locality Sensitive Hashing

Empirical Results

Discussion and Critique

Related Methods

Spectral Hashing

Random Fourier Features

References

1. B. Kulis, K. Grauman, "Kernelized Locality-Sensitive Hashing," In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, June 2012.